Love Wins

pastor Rob Bell’s latest book is Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, And The Fate Of Every Person Who Ever Lived. it’s garnering a lot of heat, attention, and criticism. search the internet and you’ll read posts on blogs, articles on websites, and comments from all kinds of people either slamming the book as heresy or claiming it’s merely misunderstood and has been misrepresented.

i would fall into the second category.

i think folks started to get hot as soon as they read the cover. i think a lot of folks made up their minds about the book as soon as they saw the words of the subtitle. why?

what is our strange attachment to a particular set of beliefs and statements about a topic? are we afraid to learn something new or different? are we afraid to be corrected?

Bell wrote the book “for all those, everywhere, who have heard some version of the Jesus story that caused their pulse rate to rise, their stomach to churn, and their heart to utter those resolute words ‘I would never be a part of that.'” he also wrote the book “because the kind of faith Jesus invites us into doesn’t skirt the big questions about topics like God and Jesus and salvation and judgment and heaven and hell, but takes us deep into the heart of them.” (Love Wins, viii-ix).

Jesus was never afraid to answer and ask questions. why are we?

several denominations and theological frameworks will take issue with what they perceive Bell is stating. read his book again. is he saying what you think he’s saying? or, are you guilty of eisegesis? are you reading your theological paradigm, or the lack of your theological paradigm, into Bell’s text?

i think  Love Wins is wonderful.

the stories and comments are thoughtful. the engagement with Scripture is great. the commentary is practical and meaningful.

it’s well-written. Bell’s style is very engaging, easy to follow, and easy to understand.

the questions he asks are important. let’s ask these questions of ourselves and our traditions. let’s look at the responses and analyze the answers.

Bell talks about hell. he talks about heaven. he talks about the salvific work of Jesus Christ. he talks about God and God’s love. he does not deny the existence of hell, he merely highlights the fact that there’s hell on earth as well. there’s heaven too.

i’m not about to claim my understanding of God and the shcool of theology i identify with is the theological framework and understanding of the Bible out there. it’s sad when we Christians are this arrogant. we are creation trying to understand our Creator. it’s almost like this blog post trying to understand me.

please read this book. you don’t have to like it. you don’t have to agree with it. but you do have to read it if you want to make comments about it.

“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accpeting it.” (Aristotle)

“‘For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,’ declares the LORD.” (Isaiah 55:8)

Advertisements

2 Responses to Love Wins

  1. ilcapitanoinquisitore says:

    Mark, I couldn’t resist leaving a comment on this one! I have read this book and let me shout from the rooftops: “I LOVED IT!” People need to stop the abuse of things that they have no education on. I am no expert, but I believe that most of the people who have trashed Love Wins haven’t even read the book. For those of us who have read the book, we see it as one author’s view-point, and if you think that one author’s view is going to change the entire world into a bunch of Bell-following heretics, than this may say more about the individual than the author.
    Do i agree with everything Bell offers? Absolutely Not! But does he make some interesting points? Without a doubt. Mark you may remember that we once had a professor who made the comment: “Heaven may not be as full as people think it will be!” Bell is kind of offering the same suggestion. The part that I have had more difficulty grasping is that hell could be “for a period of time” and not forever in our sense of the term “forever.” If that is true than even our SA doctrines would perhaps have to be re-worded so that “eternal punishment of the wicked” reads more like: “some punishment of the wicked!” Not sure if I am ready to mark that one down as a full-fledged conviction!

  2. markbraye says:

    no need to resist; comment away, Sheldon.

    always good to hear from you and get your two cents.

    your two cents is always worth three with me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: